🏛️ Government AI - Public Sector Intelligence

Government AI that survives
the IG, the OIG and the regulator

AI systems for federal, state and municipal agencies - citizen-services RAG, FOIA automation, document understanding, fraud detection. Every decision explainable, every model documented. Built for NIST AI RMF, FedRAMP-aware design, FISMA.

⚠️ Regulated domain

Government AI is not a black box

Every decision needs an explanation - for the regulator, for the user and for the internal auditor.

100%
Explainable Decisions
NIST AI RMF
aligned
FedRAMP
aware design
Audit-aware
design
⚙️ Government AI solutions

End-to-end AI for the sector

💬

Citizen RAG

Q&A over agency forms, regulations and benefits guidance.

  • Citation back to source paragraph
  • Plain-language explanations
  • Multi-language (EN / HE / RU)
  • Escalation paths to human caseworker
📨

FOIA Response Automation

Document discovery + redaction-suggestion for FOIA requests.

  • PII / exemption suggestion (b1 / b6 / b7)
  • Audit trail per request
  • Reviewer-in-the-loop
  • SLA tracking
📄

Document Understanding

OCR + extraction over forms, statutes, case files.

  • Form-field extraction with confidence
  • Statute / regulation citation graph
  • Multi-page table parsing
  • Handwriting + low-quality scan support
🛡️

Public-Sector Fraud Detection

Benefits fraud, procurement fraud, identity fraud.

  • Cross-program signal fusion
  • Network / graph analysis
  • Explainable risk scores
  • Investigator workflow integration
🔐

Security and Authority to Operate

Built for FISMA / FedRAMP-aware design and ATO process.

  • NIST 800-53 control mapping
  • Continuous monitoring (CDM)
  • Audit trail for every model decision
  • Vendor risk management
📊

Model Governance

Documentation, monitoring and audit per NIST AI RMF.

  • Model card + system card per Mitchell et al. 2019
  • Drift detection on population shift
  • Bias monitoring by demographic
  • Reportable adverse-event tracking
📋 Regulation

Built for every regulator in the room

🇺🇸

US: NIST AI RMF, OMB M-24-10, FedRAMP, FOIA

NIST AI Risk Management Framework, OMB M-24-10 governance guidance, FedRAMP-aware design for cloud workloads, FOIA response obligations, FISMA security baselines.

🇪🇺

EU: EU AI Act (public sector), GDPR, eIDAS

EU AI Act Annex III high-risk classification for public-administration AI, GDPR Articles 22 + 35 (DPIA), eIDAS for trusted citizen authentication.

🇮🇱

IL: Privacy Protection, INCD, GovCloud

Israel Privacy Protection Law 5741, INCD security baselines for public-sector cloud, MoF GovCloud guidance, Freedom of Information Law 5758.

📊 Industry benchmarks

What to expect from Government AI that works in production

Most models fail not in the demo - but in production: drift, audit, integration. Here is what the public industry research reports and where our architectural contribution comes in.

💬

Citizen RAG accuracy

What the industry reports: RAG over agency guidance with retrieval-then-generate reports 85-90% answer-with-correct-citation, vs ~70% for plain LLM (US GAO AI assessment 2024).

Where we come in: Citation back to source paragraph, plain-language explanations, escalation paths to human caseworker, multi-language - so every citizen answer is traceable.

  • Citation back to source paragraph (no answer without source)
  • Plain-language explanations (no jargon)
  • Multi-language (EN / HE / RU)
  • Escalation paths to human caseworker
📨

FOIA response time

What the industry reports: Document-understanding + redaction-suggestion reduces FOIA response cycle by 35-50% while preserving exemption accuracy (NARA / OGIS 2024).

Where we come in: PII / exemption suggestion (b1 / b6 / b7), audit trail per request, reviewer-in-the-loop, SLA tracking - reviewer stays in control of every redaction.

  • Exemption suggestion (b1 / b6 / b7) with confidence
  • Audit trail per request
  • Reviewer-in-the-loop on every redaction
  • SLA tracking with alerting
🛡️

Public-sector fraud detection

What the industry reports: Cross-program signal fusion identifies 2-4x more fraud rings than single-program rule-based detection while reducing false-positives by 25-40% (US Treasury OIG 2024).

Where we come in: Cross-program signal fusion, network / graph analysis, explainable risk scores, investigator workflow integration - actionable, not just alert volume.

  • Cross-program signal fusion (not single program)
  • Network / graph analysis for rings
  • Explainable risk scores (SHAP)
  • Investigator workflow integration

* SLAtech, since 2004. We have worked with government agencies, state departments and public-sector vendors in 14 countries. Commercial examples available on a consultation call.

Ready to build Government AI that survives IG / OIG / regulator inspection?

30-minute consultation call - we map the agency use cases, propose an architecture, and quantify ROI.